<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Yglesias on Capitalism and Central Planning</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/yglesias_on_central_planning/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:12:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Yglesias on Capitalism and Central Planning</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2008/11/23/yglesias-on-central-planning/#comment-3992543</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt's post is terrific, as is your analysis of it, Tim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, Matt's point belies his and his friends' policy views on most topics. Myriad are the progressives, liberals, leftists -- or for that matter, even conservatives -- who profess a belief in markets, dynamism, and entrepreneurship...except, well, except in the case of health care...and maybe energy...and, oh yeah, education...and, I guess, retirement savings...and I probably have to throw in automobiles...and I suppose markets just don't work for finance, insurance, air travel, telecom, or the Internet either. And definitely not general labor markets. No, no, no. All these things are subject to dramatic and chronic market failure and are too important to be left to people and markets. But other than that, have at it!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bret Swanson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>