<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Whitehouse.gov Switches to Drupal</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/whitehousegov_switches_to_drupal/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:36:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Whitehouse.gov Switches to Drupal</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/24/whitehouse-gov-switches-to-drupal/#comment-21051542</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think one can conceptualize and develop in both models - open source and proprietary.  We see it daily.  I don't think open source has a monopoly on the conceptualization process.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, for some parts of the open source ecosystem - such as for GPL licenses - the model may have an edge on the proprietary model in that where accessed through skilled technicians, one can see the underlying instructions / code.  Thus, in terms of those who can plausibly access the instructions versus closed systems, the potential to conceptualize based on that access might be greater.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, who knows?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems impossible to make any generalizations on this.  Ideas also find generation through selfish, moral means.  Private property - i.e., proprietary ownership and access - has proven to be one of the greatest wealth and public benefit generating forces man has ever seen.          &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mwendy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whitehouse.gov Switches to Drupal</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/24/whitehouse-gov-switches-to-drupal/#comment-21048766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As I understand it, open source is an asset or commodity that can be used for free. I agree that value cannot be realized without development, but conceptualizing is the essential first step. Without that, you have nothing. If you consider how a country like the US or UK is going to compete with China or India, it is in the generation of ideas, and its concomitant value-add. Such ideas can then be developed (for lower cost), adding to value.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RogerJH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:51:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whitehouse.gov Switches to Drupal</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/24/whitehouse-gov-switches-to-drupal/#comment-21048004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Roger, it seems to me that while open source can be a good way to develop products and services - the latter (i.e., development of products and services), no matter how it occurs, is where true value lies.  Conceptualizing - heck, we do that all day.  Ideas, if one wants to base risk models on them, must result in other than the ether.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mwendy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:39:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whitehouse.gov Switches to Drupal</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/24/whitehouse-gov-switches-to-drupal/#comment-20992297</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So does this mean the Republicans will have to use Wordpress just out of red team v. blue team spite?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Berin Szoka</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:44:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Whitehouse.gov Switches to Drupal</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2009/10/24/whitehouse-gov-switches-to-drupal/#comment-20948653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed. It's encouraging to see this official endorsement of open source. Besides software, we are seeing more and more models of open source that are showing proprietary ownership of knowledge is not the only way to capitalize on knowledge. Imaginatively used open source (be it software or some other commodity) shows that the true wealth and value is in conceptualizing. This is the basis of the idea economy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RogerJH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:49:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>