<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/vonage_we_ain8217t_got_no_work_arounds/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:23:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/20/vonage-we-aint-got-no-work-arounds/#comment-1450655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, my name is Jonney, I am from Zaire.&lt;br&gt;Just like your resource :).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonney_dam</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:23:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/20/vonage-we-aint-got-no-work-arounds/#comment-1450658</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I haven't followed the V vs V case closely enough, but does anyone know whether obvious &lt;a href="http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:PuN8M1EVZpsJ:www.isoc.org/HMP/PAPER/081/html/paper.html+ucl+isdn+gateway&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=6&amp;amp;gl=us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:PuN8M1EVZpsJ:www.isoc.org/HMP/PAPER/081/html/paper.html+ucl+isdn+gateway&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=6&amp;amp;gl=us"&gt;prior&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983bbn..reptR....R" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983bbn..reptR....R"&gt;art&lt;/a&gt; has been brought to the court's attention?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dimitris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:12:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/20/vonage-we-aint-got-no-work-arounds/#comment-1450657</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Russell Shaw of zdnet did some work abstracting the patents down for us.  Decide for yourself:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1517" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-telephony/?p=1517"&gt;http://blogs.zdnet.com/ip-t...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug Lay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 08:45:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/20/vonage-we-aint-got-no-work-arounds/#comment-1450656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tim claims the Verizon patent covers "converting IP addresses to phone numbers." While I haven't read the patent in question, I doubt that it's actually quite that broad, because of prior art and whatnot. It would be interesting to see what the case is really about, without the breathless hyperbole.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Bennett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 06:09:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/20/vonage-we-aint-got-no-work-arounds/#comment-1450659</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Of course, this doesn't address the point that granting a broad patent on the very concept of interfacing between two types of network - especially networks as broadly used as the phone network and the Internet - is anti-competitive, anti-capitalist, and anti-consumer.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course- this does not help the big picture; if anything, eBay (by taking away a pain point) makes real solutions less likely. But in the small picture, it seems worth noting that this is not necessarily the bad sign for Vonage so many people seem to think it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis Villa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/20/vonage-we-aint-got-no-work-arounds/#comment-1450662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Luis:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree that it's possible the CAFC may overturn the district court injunction and cite Ebay for justification.  That's certainly the outcome I hope for.  Time is of the essence though - even a few more months of uncertaintly will be enouh to put Vonage out of business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course, this doesn't address the point that granting a broad patent on the very concept of interfacing between two types of network - especially networks as broadly used as the phone network and the Internet - is anti-competitive, anti-capitalist, and anti-consumer.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug Lay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:29:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/20/vonage-we-aint-got-no-work-arounds/#comment-1450661</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Note that per the court's recent decision in &lt;i&gt;eBay&lt;/i&gt;, this may work in Vonage's favor in defeating the proposed injunction in this case. If the option is 'no injunction' or 'make Vonage implement a workaround', then the court is supposed to favor making Vonage implement the work around. If the option is 'no injunction' or 'completely screw Vonage's several million users', the court is supposed to at least take that into consideration when discussing the injunction (though it may not be decisive.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis Villa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:51:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Vonage: We Ain&amp;#8217;t Got No Work-arounds</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/20/vonage-we-aint-got-no-work-arounds/#comment-1450660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is what Stallman has been saying about software patents for years.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rkillings</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 16:21:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>