<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Virtual Reality or Virtual Stupidity?</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/virtual_reality_or_virtual_stupidity/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:30:31 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Virtual Reality or Virtual Stupidity?</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/10/16/virtual-reality-or-virtual-stupidity/#comment-1448180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is like the iPod -- people will be wearing these around with them turned off, just because it's fashionable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Btw -- with a television wrapped around your head, why do you still have to look at a monitor full of clouds?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">greglas</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virtual Reality or Virtual Stupidity?</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/10/16/virtual-reality-or-virtual-stupidity/#comment-1448179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That picture is actually of Adam. The pink shirt and Darth Vader helmut are a disguise when he plays video games.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hmmm, strange. Why did Adam get a better computer monitor in his office than me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noel Le</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:53:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virtual Reality or Virtual Stupidity?</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/10/16/virtual-reality-or-virtual-stupidity/#comment-1448181</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Also, there's no visible means of support on her shoulders, which means that the hard plastic of the device would dig into your shoulders painfully. And why is the back of the device so huge? It looks like a Photoshop job to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:34:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Virtual Reality or Virtual Stupidity?</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/10/16/virtual-reality-or-virtual-stupidity/#comment-1448178</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Adam -- perhaps I'm just naturally suspicious, but have you considered the possibility that this is a hoax?  The photo just doesn't look right.  (Why, for instance, is she looking at a TV screen when the gargantuan device is on her head.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I checked around the web for more, and was unable to find any reference of this outside the Daily Mail piece that you linked to and a number of blogs that also link to it.  I also noted that the Daily Mail has a second piece reporting that a Chinese scientist has made a robotic "twin" of himself, with a robotic skeleton and silica gel for skin, that looks and talks just like him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is possible that both stories are true.  But I wouldn't bet on it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Gattuso</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 12:25:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>