Community Page
- techliberation.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- There seems to be a cottage industry dedicated to papering-over the negative effects that Internet piracy has on creative artists and others who toil to produce content. We devalue creative work by...
- My off the cuff response is that it doesn't make sense to compare the costs for a website of this size to a state website which serves 1/50th of the users. if it includes database support,...
- Regardless of what may or may not be happening with robots.txt files (a subject about which I have no data,) the fact remains that Google doesn't pay for content and doesn't produce...
- Thanks to our old friend, the DMCA, such devices such as the ones Chadlee mentioned, are illegal. Macrovision corporation is even succeeding in making plain old CGMS/Macro removal boxes disappear...
- Who records off an HDMI output anyway? All HDCP does is to create a slew of devices that dont work, especially Blu-ray players that enforce HDCP and off brand tv's that have non HDCP compliant...
The Technology Liberation Front
The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.
A new case pits Universal Music Group against an eBay merchant re-selling "promo CDs." Fred von Lohmann of EFF has agreed to take the merchant's case in order to vindicate the First Sale Doctrine. Randy Picker and Braden Cox also weigh in.
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
There is one argument in Mr. Augusto's favor, though, that I have not seen presented yet, which I heard several years ago and always appealed to me.
The argument is that a 'First Sale' HAS taken place by virtue of Universal mailing out these promotional CDs in the hope or expectation of receiving 'buzz' or good press. While no money exchanged hands, Universal did not send these CDs out to everyone. Their court statement reads that the CDs are sent to "a select group of individuals who are in a position to generate "buzz" or interest in the recording among the consuming public". Universal is not distributing these CDs out of the goodness of their heart - they are distributing them in the specific hope of receiving something in return. I believe you can make an argument that a 'sale' now has taken place, even though no money changed hands.
Further, and specfic to Mr. Augusto's case, one of the CDs Universal is claiming ownership of is emphatically different by its nature from the others it is contesting. Universal lists The Killers 'Sam's Town Best Buy Exclusive' as one of the CDs they own, but this CD is not like the others, and was not sent out to reviewers. Rather, it was sold to thousands of consumers by Best Buy Stores as a bonus for early purchasers of the Killers album. The Killers CD, unlike the others on Universal's list, WAS most definitely paid for with cash by the consumers who bought the item at Best Buy, including many CD dealers who buy these limited items specifically to resell them to collectors without access to Best Buy who want the rare CDs.
Good luck, JAY
1 year ago
One issue that hasn't been mentioned is the method of distribution. If the Music companies sent the CDs out as unsolicited items via USPS they are considered gifts by law, which means first sale applies and post hoc restrictions don't.
1 year ago
1 year ago
1 year ago
5 months ago