-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Since that $750 per family is money we don't have, that would be $750 per family plus interest on the debt in perpetuity. Or it could be monetized, in which case it regressively taxes everyone...
- For the record, the supporters of "Google violates its 'Don't be Evil' motto swept the floor with the Google apologists, even with Googleboy Larry Lessig in the audience. See the...
- Slippery slopes are everywhere, so I wouldn't worry about them. These issues about probable cause only apply to the government, as I understand them, but IANAL. Assuming there were something to...
- Apparently I can reply to your comment via e-mail. We'll see if this works. (later) Indeed it does, with a few formatting weirdnesses is all.
- Same here. My response to you hasn't shown up.I guess Disqus doesn't want to get anyone upset.
The Technology Liberation Front
The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.The Technology Liberation Front » Archive » Why both M and AO ratings for games?
Started by TLF · 3 months ago
11 months ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_ratings#X_is_...
So MPAA doesn't retain NC-17 and X ratings side by side with one another.
11 months ago
11 months ago
After all, there's a few NC-17 indy and foreign films which might run the risk of qualifying as "obscenity" if shown to a minor. E.G. "Inside Deep Throat" (documentary about the porn movie, with graphic clips from same), "The Dreamers," or "Lust, Caution." Not to mention a handful of old, officially X rated films that moved to NC-17 after the changeover.