Community Page
- techliberation.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- There seems to be a cottage industry dedicated to papering-over the negative effects that Internet piracy has on creative artists and others who toil to produce content. We devalue creative work by...
- My off the cuff response is that it doesn't make sense to compare the costs for a website of this size to a state website which serves 1/50th of the users. if it includes database support,...
- Regardless of what may or may not be happening with robots.txt files (a subject about which I have no data,) the fact remains that Google doesn't pay for content and doesn't produce...
- Thanks to our old friend, the DMCA, such devices such as the ones Chadlee mentioned, are illegal. Macrovision corporation is even succeeding in making plain old CGMS/Macro removal boxes disappear...
- Who records off an HDMI output anyway? All HDCP does is to create a slew of devices that dont work, especially Blu-ray players that enforce HDCP and off brand tv's that have non HDCP compliant...
The Technology Liberation Front
The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.The Technology Liberation Front » Archive » Racist Shorts and Fair Use
Started by TLF · 10 months ago
1 year ago
People keep saying it's offensive. Could someone tell me exactly how?
1 year ago
1 year ago
The cartoon also portrays the African-American characters as stupid, replacing the word "seven" with "sebben" and prince with "pwince." I don't think this can be explained away as a benign way of accounting for a peculiar accent, but rather meant to portray African-Americans in a negative light.
I agree that the storyline isn't offensive in that it mainly follows the original story, but the clearly racists caricatures used in the cartoon I'm sure weren't well received by African-American audiences and some more enlightened individuals at the time it was realeased at and hopefully shouldn't be received well by anyone now.
However, I have to agree that not allowing these to be seen now is a shame. To see what kind of openly racist material was mainstream only 60 years ago is shocking, no matter how familiar you are with the era.
I think this should be incorporated into history courses in high school. Rather than teaching out kids that the U.S. was an enlightened land of equality fighting evil, racist Nazis we should show them the world has many more shades of gray. While the U.S. was fighting the most hideously racist regime in history, we were busy oppressing minority groups at home.
Showing kids the real, ubiquitous racism that existed only two generations ago will hopefully educate them on how far we've come since then and how far we have to go.
1 year ago
The use of dialect as an element of humor was common in the forties, and not restricted to blacks. Taking the most obvious Warner's example, look at the Pepe le Pew cartoons. Those make me cringe because I know how little Pepe's language has to do with actual French, but no one could say that the intent is to present him as stupid. (He's blind to his own defects, yes, but that's shown by other means.)
There are other Warner cartoons of the period that clearly are racist. "All This and Rabbit Stew" may be the most blatant; it shows a black kid who's slow, stupid, and addicted to gambling. "Confederate Honey" has a really disgusting moment in which the blacks picking cotton are shown as lazy and doing hardly any physical work. If it's desirable to show examples of racism in cartoons to modern school kids, I'd choose those two as among the most obvious.
But portraying "Coal Black" as racist requires applying a different standard to it than to other cartoon work of the same period.
1 year ago