<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in The Technology Liberation Front  &amp;raquo; Archive   &amp;raquo; Patent Sharks</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:37:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Technology Liberation Front  &amp;raquo; Archive   &amp;raquo; Patent Sharks</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/30/patent-sharks/#comment-1454823</link><description>I look forward to reading this paper. Meanwhile I note that the US Constitution Article 1 section 8 limit the power of congress to grant such patent monopolies for limited times and to useful arts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This suggests that the  advance must be useful not just minor variations on a know theme, and the they must also be limited in time- that is no patent should outlast the useful life of the invention. Given the advance of technical progress  it is likely the current patent period is effectively infinite,and thus eclipses the power of congress to grant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given that patents generally require the holder to take enforcement action   they are useless to most small inventors, for whom such a patent fight would be pointless (note the case of STac electronics v Microsoft ) and thus patents are not even remotely associated with protecting inventors, but rather the Corporation, likely in exchange for campaign funds. In short no challenge to patents is likely to be successful if it relies on appeals to  "promoting Science and the useful arts" as it is clear to me that modern patent law has no such purpose in mind, but it may be possible to accelerate the expiration of such patents to be more constant with the pace of change technology.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other important questions include the issue of the scope of patents over an entire class of inventions -- such patents are rarely enforced but they make great fodder for greenmail. If we do not reform our patent system inventors will be forced to take refuge overseas.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc Grundfest</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:37:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Technology Liberation Front  &amp;raquo; Archive   &amp;raquo; Patent Sharks</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/06/30/patent-sharks/#comment-1454824</link><description>Tim,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yup, academic caution.  The paper that I'm working on now, however, will not be so cautious.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gerard Magliocca</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gerard</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:57:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>