<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in The Mystery of the 99 Cent iTune</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 22:03:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Mystery of the 99 Cent iTune</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/30/the-mystery-of-the-99-cent-itune/#comment-1446026</link><description>An excellent point. I think our two explanations mesh well. In both arguments, Jobs is treating music sales as a loss leader: either for iPod sales, or for future music sales. I suspect there's some of both going on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 22:03:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Mystery of the 99 Cent iTune</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/30/the-mystery-of-the-99-cent-itune/#comment-1446027</link><description>I have a different explanation and it has to do with systems competition (again). Apple is making money on the iPod, which it controls, not the music, which it doesn't control. For more, see my post:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/2005/10/the_ipod_razrs_.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/2005/10/...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy Picker</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 18:51:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>