DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! The Technology Liberation Front is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

The Technology Liberation Front

The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.
Jump to original thread »
Author

The DMCA versus Computer Hobbyists

Started by TLF · 11 months ago

8 comments

  • metapundit

    3 years ago

    Both those links go to a login page... You wanted http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060131-6...
  • Tim

    3 years ago

    Fixed, thanks!
  • Luis Villa

    3 years ago

    See also these notes on a MS VP's talk in London, where apparently the MS rep said that DRM will be licensed only to major players: "We don't want this technology to be available to every hobbyist. We need to keep the number of licensees down to a manageable number. We charge a license fee to keep the number of people we have to deal with down to a level we can handle." It is clear that DRM (both from MS and Apple) is an anti-competitive device for hardware and software makers as much or more so than it is an anti-competitive move on the part of the entertainment industry.
  • naiserie

    3 years ago

    Yay, more reasons not to use MS!!!

    Seriously though, very few people will bend over for this sort of thing. Who is going to drop money on a brand new machine immediately simply because it's "certified"?

    Moreover, it's only a matter of time before the protection is cracked...someone somewhere will code the bios/firmware enabling those of us who prefer to continue using XP or *nix to view/record despite the DRM. Then we'll get more of the same "piracy is bankrupting hollywood" drivel.

    As evidenced by reactions to this story (and the ongoing DRM drama generally), I don't think this sort of strategy from MS will payoff in the long run. Consumers want flexibility with their content, and one way or another ("illegally" if need be) most of us will have it. Statements regarding restricted usage from MS and others are direct challeges to teh haxxors out there, and more often than not, teh haxxors win.
  • Phillip

    3 years ago

  • short url

    2 years ago

    ddbeafedf2d5 Hello! http:/0zu.tw/ short url
  • Stan

    2 years ago

    Couple of points.

    CableLabs will consider any product for certification, the requirement is that you need to supply nearly 30 copies of the product and pay a significant (read, multi 10's of k $$) fee.

    Consumers will need a certified PC *if* they intend to legally use the PC as their cable STB.

    -s
  • tramadol

    2 years ago

    81e31de21f46 Nice site http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav tramadol

Add New Comment

Comments are closed for this post.
Returning? Login