<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Supreme Court Will Hear Indecency Case</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:14:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Supreme Court Will Hear Indecency Case</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/03/18/supreme-court-will-hear-indecency-case/#comment-1453598</link><description>Yes, the people of the United States and the United States government need to take steps to deal with online child pornography. Ten years of adult retail websites running underaged streaming clips is enough. All of these sites attempting to hide the fact that certain performer or performers were of age and records are kept is bogus. None of those sites keep age records and run underaged adult clips of copyrighted material, by the way. Enough is enough. Let's start using the COPA regulations and fine every single solitary one of these sites $500,000, place injunctions against the sites, and give the site owners prison terms for these last ten years of underaged display of porn, also redirecting consumers from the site to the performer's real name, against child privacy too. What is it, if a child is under 13 it's not okay, but if the performer was 15 or 16 it's okay? Let's put a stop to it! Enough is enough!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wonn Roppots</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:14:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>