<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Sticky Technology and Patent Policy</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:43:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sticky Technology and Patent Policy</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/10/31/sticky-technology-and-patent-policy/#comment-1452432</link><description>I think the "tacit knowledge" of Hayek and Polanyi has a lot to do with this.  An innovation may involve a considerable amount of tacit, idiosyncratic knowledge on the part of the innovator, that cannot be reduced to a verbal formula.  Formulating such innovations as "best practices" involves just that--reducing them to a verbal formula, so that they can be transmitted from one organization to another.  But something is lost in translation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tacit knowledge is probably a major component of x-efficiency, as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Carson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:43:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>