DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! The Technology Liberation Front is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

The Technology Liberation Front

The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.
Jump to original thread »
Author

Some Obvious Thing

Started by TLF · 10 months ago

4 comments

  • "Patents are bad for the software industry?"

    Probably not, for incumbents. Government-enforced barriers to entry are a good thing. USPTO does for Big Software what the FCC does for Big Media and the FDA does for Big Pharma.

  • "Patents are bad for the software industry?"

    Probably not, for incumbents. Government-enforced barriers to entry are a good thing. USPTO does for Big Software what the FCC does for Big Media and the FDA does for Big Pharma.

    No. government enforced barriers to entry are almost uniformly a bad thing, and lead inevitably to less competition.

    Conflating Health and Safety or environmental programs with other 'Government-enforced barriers to entry' is not correct; those programs are necessary for other reasons, and although they may sometimes be a barrier to entry, they are not always so.

    They exist for other reasons. Just ask a few folks in Panama that bought what they thought was cold medicine...
  • Bullshit...
  • Of course they can be both good for the incumbents and bad for the industry as a whole.

Add New Comment

Returning? Login