<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Should Government Funding Be Part of a Broadband Plan? Have Your Say on November 18</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:49:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Should Government Funding Be Part of a Broadband Plan? Have Your Say on November 18</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/10/22/should-government-funding-be-part-of-a-broadband-plan-have-your-say-on-november-18/#comment-3227328</link><description>We are all Keynesians now, Drew.  Just how far does government think it should take it to meet its moving goalpost?  A house of cards clearly exists - the USF (or like) v. rate re-balancing to help get us more broadband.  US policy has removed most of pricing signals (rate re-balancing) that would allow particpants to enter under-served markets.  The USF and other subsidies - the political animal born from Theodore Vails enlightened self-interest - are "too big to fail," and rate re-balancing to politcally distasteful; the only option left is to expand government's role in the roll out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mwendy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:49:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>