<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Search Engine Legality</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/search_engine_legality/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:02:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Search Engine Legality</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2005/10/20/search-engine-legality/#comment-1444601</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly right!&lt;br&gt;The publishers are stuck.  They have a buggy whip mentality in an internal combusion new world.  They seem willing to settle if Google can show them how they come out ahead and pays them a bunch of money to admit it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;BetaMax created an entirly new and lucrative revenue stream for Hollywood and TV and greatly reduced the breakeven point for many, many films.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terry "OldFox" Seale</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:02:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>