Community Page
- techliberation.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Your issue as I understand it is with Level 3 - are they an ILEC? Isn't Qwest (or a local coop) the ILEC there in Laramie? Two - you provide services a lot like a local exchange - I would guess...
- Yes, I will agree that you are not "getting me." First of all, I do not buy unbundled network elements (UNEs), nor am I a CLEC. I am a wireless ISP -- a true last mile provider and an...
- <i>I'd buy a newspaper that reported substance over he said/she said stenography mixed with tabloid fluff.</i> You might, but I think most of the evidence suggests that not very...
- This is too funny!
- Good point I Can't agree more ..... and its not if those people dnt want things to change ....
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
But "doing more" inevitably involved age-verifying teens, which despite being impossible, they said social networking sites should at least try to do more of. And then they made all sorts of misguided analogies about how we make people show ID before buying beer or tobacco so that youngsters can't get it. I countered that (a) what made that possible was a state-issued driver's license that most teens under the age of 16 don't have; and (b) the analogy was inappropriate because there is a world of difference between allowing kids to buy beer versus allowing them on a social networking website where the vast majority of their activities are socially beneficial and not harmful to them or others. They didn't care. They just kept on advocating age-verification for ALL teens even though they had no idea how to do so and the entire panel before us had said again and again that age verification for teens was impossible. I finally got so frustrated that I said something to the effect that "we should stop treating kids like criminals and start paying more attention to finding the real criminals and put them in jail." That just got them even more angry with me.