DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! The Technology Liberation Front is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

The Technology Liberation Front

The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.
Jump to original thread »
Author

Regulators to Save Us from Loud TV Ads and Product Placements

Started by TLF · 10 months ago

Couch potatoes of America, have no fear… Your friendly neighborhood super-regulators are about to swoop in and save you from the scourge of loud TV ads and “illegal” product placements! As we all learned in our high school Civics 101 classes, this is why the ... Continue reading »

10 comments

  • Richard Bennett

    1 year ago

    Loud commercials promote the sale of DVRs. Eshoo and Lofgren are hurting TiVo.
    reply
  • Tom

    1 year ago

    I'm quite please to hear that action is being taken regarding the loudness problem, which has recently become dramatically worse. Do you really think regulation in this regard is likely to work more efficiently than the market -- that consumers should be relied upon to flock to stations with quieter ads? Or, perhaps, to buy new devices that counteract the loudness?

    That seems a bit ridiculous. Mandating some kind of sane RMS normalization criterion on broadcast TV is an obviously more efficient way to address the problem. If enough Americans feel it's a problem that their representatives will enact such legislation, then what's the problem? It should be self-evident that imposing some limits on advertising techniques are necessary and reasonable if we want to have a livable society.

    This post is just knee-jerk anti-regulation rhetoric. But that's not enough to constitute an argument, I'm afraid: what is the alleged cost or inefficiency that this proposed rule will introduce?
    reply
  • Adam Thierer

    1 year ago

    "If enough Americans feel it’s a problem that their representatives will enact such legislation, then what’s the problem?"

    Sure, why not. I mean untrammeled majoritarianism is the American way, right? So let me substitute a few words here... "If enough Americans feel [offensive talk] is a problem that their representatives will enact such legislation [to limit it], then what’s the problem?"

    Well, that's IS the problem in my book. The slippery slope of speech regulation is real.
    reply
  • waterwalker

    4 months ago

    that is not the same thing.

    I can cope with offensive talk, what I cannot cope with is a stranger coming in to my home and turning the volume up just for commercials.
    reply
  • Richard Bennett

    1 year ago

    Some of the home entertainment equipment vendors have built systems to find "high impact" programming, in order to show the highlights of a football game or what have you. These systems respond to video as well as audio qualities, such as vivid images and replays. Early systems identified commercials as high impact because there's more intensity at every level in a 30-second spot than in regular programming. So what's next, no good-looking women or car chases in commercials?
    reply
  • Tom

    1 year ago

    I'm seeing a lot of rhetorical tricks, and not a lot of explanations of what normalizing the volume costs us. This is not a restriction of speech any more than are the laws saying I can't stand outside your bedroom window with an airhorn all night. The content of speech is protected, not its physical volume.
    reply
  • Gary Dean

    11 months ago

    This writer is obviously a media industry employee.
    Not only should the government regulate the loudness of commercials, but it is now time to begin regulating the frequency, duration and content of television commercials.
    Yes, PBS would be a nightmare. PBS has more quality programming in a month than the commercial and cable stations do in a year.
    reply
  • tlfmd

    9 months ago

    If you watch TV @ 60 dB (level of conversation), commercials from all sources are at 70dB. (RadioShack sound meter ,about 80 bucks)
    Sound pressure in milliPascals is about doubled for every 3 dB.
    Thus it is hillarious that they can say they are not louder.
    reply
  • Sick of Loud Commercials

    8 months ago

    I have a sure-fire way of toning down those aggravating loud commercials... turn the damn TV off and go do something constructive. Works like a champ for me. Now, Mr. Commercial Producer, what are you going to do to buttonhole me now???
    reply
  • offended by noise

    3 months ago

    Another possible approach might be to boycot those offensively loud commercials. Don't buy their product and maybe they'll figure it out. On second thought, they would probably assume that it's still not load enough and crank it up even louder in an attempt to bring sales up. I guess what we need is an email campaign (or phone call) to the offending company telling them that we won't be buying their product no matter how wonderful it is until they bring their volume down to the same level as the program.
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login