<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Privacy Solutions (Part 2): Adblock Plus</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/privacy_solutions_series_part_2_adblock_plus/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:58:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions (Part 2): Adblock Plus</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2269804</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is very interesting, thanks Wladimir. Some of the issues with Filterset.G don't seem to exist for me (like slow browsing) but I will have to try a different set of filters.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Radia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:58:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions (Part 2): Adblock Plus</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2248940</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Filterset.G is not recommended for Adblock Plus: &lt;a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/faq_project#filterset.g" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://adblockplus.org/en/faq_project#filterset.g"&gt;http://adblockplus.org/en/f...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What you should look at if you are concerned about privacy, is ABP Tracking Filter (&lt;a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions)"&gt;http://adblockplus.org/en/s...&lt;/a&gt;. Also, current Adblock Plus development builds implement a $third-party option (&lt;a href="http://adblockplus.org/blog/recognizing-third-party-content)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://adblockplus.org/blog/recognizing-third-party-content)"&gt;http://adblockplus.org/blog...&lt;/a&gt; which gives you a way to block tracking servers in a generic way (also likely to cause collateral damage however so using it in its generic form is only something for the most paranoid).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wladimir Palant</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:27:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions (Part 2): Adblock Plus</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2242276</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't forget &lt;a href="http://www.customizegoogle.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.customizegoogle.com/"&gt;CustomizeGoogle&lt;/a&gt;.  You can configure it to remove the Google tracking when you click through on a search result.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Marti</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:58:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions (Part 2): Adblock Plus</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2237327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mike, I am totally with you on that point, but many others disagree with us. There's just a certain crowd out there that find the whole idea of commercial advertising annoying or even offensive and don't really think about the trade-off of what they would be missing without those ads being present. There is no free lunch, after all. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Thierer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions (Part 2): Adblock Plus</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2236193</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Ryan. I will check our Filterset.G&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, Berin and I are planning to cover NoScript in a future entry. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Thierer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:42:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions (Part 2): Adblock Plus</title><link>https://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2235545</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Filterset.G (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filterset.G)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filterset.G)"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt; makes AdBlock even more powerful. It really does a good job of getting rid of ads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another add-on that goes well with AdBlock is NoScript. At first, it's annoying to white-list every trusted site that uses a script, but blocking all scripts by default really does enhance security while browsing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Radia</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:19:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>