<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:58:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2269804</link><description>This is very interesting, thanks Wladimir. Some of the issues with Filterset.G don't seem to exist for me (like slow browsing) but I will have to try a different set of filters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ryanradia</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:58:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2248940</link><description>Filterset.G is not recommended for Adblock Plus: &lt;a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/faq_project#filterset.g" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://adblockplus.org/en/faq_project#filterset.g&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What you should look at if you are concerned about privacy, is ABP Tracking Filter (&lt;a href="http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://adblockplus.org/en/subscriptions&lt;/a&gt;). Also, current Adblock Plus development builds implement a $third-party option (&lt;a href="http://adblockplus.org/blog/recognizing-third-party-content" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://adblockplus.org/blog/recognizing-third-p...&lt;/a&gt;) which gives you a way to block tracking servers in a generic way (also likely to cause collateral damage however so using it in its generic form is only something for the most paranoid).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wladimir Palant</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:27:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2242276</link><description>Don't forget &lt;a href="http://www.customizegoogle.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;CustomizeGoogle&lt;/a&gt;.  You can configure it to remove the Google tracking when you click through on a search result.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Marti</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:58:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2239628</link><description>Well, when they get there way, and there's no advertising, they'll have to deal with the walled gardens like the online version of the Wallstreet Journal. Ironically, most of the "new media" will be the victims because they're the lightweight journals that have the weakest relationship with their readers when it comes to a willingness to buy access.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeRT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:22:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2237327</link><description>Mike, I am totally with you on that point, but many others disagree with us. There's just a certain crowd out there that find the whole idea of commercial advertising annoying or even offensive and don't really think about the trade-off of what they would be missing without those ads being present. There is no free lunch, after all.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam_Thierer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 17:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2236792</link><description>Honestly, I just don't know what the big deal is with most people and ads. Maybe it's just the sites I go to, but I rarely see any ads that are ugly and out of place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeRT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:57:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2236193</link><description>Thanks Ryan. I will check our Filterset.G&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, Berin and I are planning to cover NoScript in a future entry.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam_Thierer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:42:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Privacy Solutions Series: Part 2 - Adblock Plus</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/09/08/privacy-solutions-series-part-2-adblock-plus/#comment-2235545</link><description>Filterset.G (&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filterset.G" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filterset.G&lt;/a&gt;) makes AdBlock even more powerful. It really does a good job of getting rid of ads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another add-on that goes well with AdBlock is NoScript. At first, it's annoying to white-list every trusted site that uses a script, but blocking all scripts by default really does enhance security while browsing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ryanradia</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:19:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>