<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Played You for Sure</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:14:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Played You for Sure</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/09/16/played-you-for-sure/#comment-1447635</link><description>Michael Robertson posted on his website:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://michaelrobertson.com/archive.php?minute_id=219%3Cbr%3E%3C/br%3E%3Cbr" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://michaelrobertson.com/archive.php?minute_...&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;"The danger with DRM is that it gives corporations the power to change the rules of the game anytime they think it will benefit their bank account, even if that means zuning your music library. &lt;/b&gt;There's no better illustration of this than when the world's largest technology company curtails support of their OWN technology abandoning their hardware partners, music stores and most importantly customers they convinced to use Plays for Sure. Microsoft will surely claim that they'll continue to support Plays for Sure, but their actions speak louder than their words - it won't even play on their own music players! Plays for Sure is dead for sure and it's going to its grave with hundreds of millions of dollars worth of music fans' digital music crammed into the coffin."&lt;/i&gt;(empahis added)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve_R</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:14:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Played You for Sure</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/09/16/played-you-for-sure/#comment-1447634</link><description>Typicla MS product--sounds completely lame, and a total cave-in to the content providers.  But MS is really conducting a top-down marketing approach with this product--they want it to be a hit with the content owners, not the users.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Played You for Sure</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/09/16/played-you-for-sure/#comment-1447636</link><description>It strikes me, Tim, that Zune's 'three plays, three days' sharing must have been approved by the RIAA- it is clearly a looser standard for sharing than what the RIAA has permitted Apple to do. So I'd guess that Apple &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; losing some sleep over this- not the Zune per se, but over the indications that the RIAA is willing to grant non-iTunes vendors greater latitude in an effort to keep Apple in check.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis Villa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:03:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>