<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Net Neutrality: Urban Legend # 5</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 11:20:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality: Urban Legend # 5</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/05/net-neutrality-urban-legend-5/#comment-1445723</link><description>GB -- I'd suggest, if you haven't already, reading the resource page we put together on the issue -- &lt;a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/Regulation_brief031306.cfm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/Reg...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The links we put in there are from both sides, so you can make the best informed decision.  No dancing around there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Gattuso</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 11:20:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality: Urban Legend # 5</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/05/net-neutrality-urban-legend-5/#comment-1445722</link><description>I still don't think it's an issue because &lt;a href="http://blindmindseye.com/site-information/my-articles/net-neutrality/" rel="nofollow"&gt;there are many factors against it&lt;/a&gt;. I seriously doubt that it is ever going to be a real issue because there is enough competition to allow people to switch from an ISP that pulls this crap.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 14:19:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality: Urban Legend # 5</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/05/net-neutrality-urban-legend-5/#comment-1445726</link><description>I'll admit that the idea of regulating network neutrality isn't so appetizing anymore, but I do feel that James' arguments seemed  to have been written in a deceptive kind of way.  It felt like I was only reading one side of the argument without much commentary on why the other side is wrong.  I'm not saying that it was deceptive, as I clearly don't know as much about it as you might, but I'm simply pointing out that when I read the articles, I felt like something was missing or being danced around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And Heritage? A admittedly conservative think-tank?  With a Rush Limbaugh quote at the top promoting it?  It's not exactly inspiring me with confidence that it would be unbiased and fact based, either.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, I now have a feeling that Internet regulation would be bad and that the doom and gloom about the loss of network neutrality is likely exaggerated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GBGames</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 11:23:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality: Urban Legend # 5</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/05/net-neutrality-urban-legend-5/#comment-1445725</link><description>Actually, Mike, if an independent game developer tries to sell his/her games online, the idea that he/she has to pay extra money to guarantee that the bits still get to their destination, something that TCP already is supposed to guarantee, is a bit absurd.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, I was a bit suspicious that &lt;a href="http://moveon.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;moveon.org&lt;/a&gt; didn't have an actual name for the legislation, nor any links to references about it.  Still, I have had few reasons to not trust them before so I signed the petition.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm glad there are counter-points to read.  I'll look into them.  I hope that I don't come to a different conclusion and regret signing the petition prematurely, but I'm open to the possibility.  Thanks for giving me the chance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">GBGames</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 10:49:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Net Neutrality: Urban Legend # 5</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/05/net-neutrality-urban-legend-5/#comment-1445724</link><description>It's all about people bitching about file sharing being throttled down to nothing. Oh the horror. People might have to actually pay $0.99/song on iTunes or Napster instead of getting the stuff for free.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeT</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 16:06:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>