<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Musings on Freedom of Cell Phone Contract</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:21:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Musings on Freedom of Cell Phone Contract</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/23/musings-on-freedom-of-cell-phone-contract/#comment-15842698</link><description>There are sites you can swap out your cell phone number contracts.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">getcellphonenumber</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:21:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Musings on Freedom of Cell Phone Contract</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/23/musings-on-freedom-of-cell-phone-contract/#comment-1453219</link><description>Good paper. I think this recent public obsession with cell phone rights comes from consumers, and lawmakers, lacking an understanding of how markets or businesses work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cell phone contracts exist for a reason. Most people like cheap, high-tech cell phones, and once they find a good carrier they stick with them. Some people would love to change carriers or phones often, and with pay-as-you-go plans they can, if they're willing to pay the price.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consumers seem to have a utopian vision, where cell phones remain affordable but contracts go away. Then people can switch whenever they want, and their carrier is stuck with a used cellphone of diminished value. If Arizona forces this upon companies, I doubt cell phone companies will see much incentive to invest finite resources in improving service in Arizona when other states have far better opportunities for success.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With regard to the term "liberal", I remain on the fence as to whether using the term in its modern derogatory sense to refer to statists is desirable. I am a proud liberal--a classical one. Would that libertarians could reclaim the term liberal, restoring it to its original meaning, and find a new term to attack big-government statists that is not merely a rebadged term.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Radia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:31:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>