<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in More on Underdogs and Net Neutering</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 16:24:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More on Underdogs and Net Neutering</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/19/more-on-underdogs-and-net-neutering/#comment-1445926</link><description>James, the latest rhetoric from the ISPs is that Google and Microsoft &lt;a href="http://blindmindseye.com/2006/05/14/the-people-shouldnt-have-to-pay-for-internet-access-at-all/" rel="nofollow"&gt;want to stick the public with practically all of the costs&lt;/a&gt;. Neither side is innocent here. In fact, I can't see why anyone is particularly sympathetic to either side.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeT</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 16:24:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More on Underdogs and Net Neutering</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/05/19/more-on-underdogs-and-net-neutering/#comment-1445925</link><description>When you apply the same "underdog argument" to the issue of DRM, for example, you see technology and software companies falling over each other to satisfy the content industry, despite the content industry being orders of magnitude smaller than the technology and software industries.  Why is it that you suppose companies like Microsoft or Intel or Samsung or whoever are willing to accede to the RIAA/MPAA's demands, despite being much larger companies in a much, much larger industry?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Barry</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 14:55:59 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>