Hello! The Technology Liberation Front is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- techliberation.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- There seems to be a cottage industry dedicated to papering-over the negative effects that Internet piracy has on creative artists and others who toil to produce content. We devalue creative work by...
- My off the cuff response is that it doesn't make sense to compare the costs for a website of this size to a state website which serves 1/50th of the users. if it includes database support,...
- Regardless of what may or may not be happening with robots.txt files (a subject about which I have no data,) the fact remains that Google doesn't pay for content and doesn't produce...
- Thanks to our old friend, the DMCA, such devices such as the ones Chadlee mentioned, are illegal. Macrovision corporation is even succeeding in making plain old CGMS/Macro removal boxes disappear...
- Who records off an HDMI output anyway? All HDCP does is to create a slew of devices that dont work, especially Blu-ray players that enforce HDCP and off brand tv's that have non HDCP compliant...
The Technology Liberation Front
The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.
The National Cable & Telecommunications Association blog did a series of posts back in February about the OECD study. There seems to be three basic criticisms. First, businesses in the US have a higher proportion of “special access” lines than other countries ran
... Continue reading »
1 year ago
Our agenda is solely to use an accurate yardstick when measuring broadband deployment. Currently the OECD study uses metrics that we don't believe truly reflect the real state of US broadband.
The biggest trouble is the subscribers per 100 inhabitants number. If every single household and ever single business in every country measured, had a connection, the metric should show a tie for first.
Unfortunately, under those conditions, the OECD study would actually drop us 8 places from 12th to 20th. That's hardly an unbiased metric.
We're currently working with OECD on ways to improve their study. New measures will likely still show the US has work to do. However, we'll at least be confident that our nation's broadband efforts are not being discounted due to faulty metrics.