<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Lessig&amp;#8217;s orphan works proposal unworkable</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:53:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Lessig&amp;#8217;s orphan works proposal unworkable</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/02/lessigs-orphan-works-proposal-unworkable/#comment-1449638</link><description>In regards to anonymous: Flickr, Riya and even Google Image Search has shown that image search is realistic and useful.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't doubt technological innovation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kdonovan11</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:53:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lessig&amp;#8217;s orphan works proposal unworkable</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/02/02/lessigs-orphan-works-proposal-unworkable/#comment-1449636</link><description>&lt;i&gt;One idea is that they will be sham searches, that after a cursory search a user will just be able to use a work that really isn't orphaned without making a serious attempt at getting permission, and that courts will absolve these users of any liability. As I've explained before, courts will not accept sham searches and will give real meaning to "reasonable," just as they do in every other part of the law. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we are going to require mandatory registration, presumably according to some standard, it would be a simple matter to create a database of all titles, and authors.  The "reasonably diligent search" would be defined as consulting with this database.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, it seems that the current fetish for private sector initiatives would be misplaced here--the Library of Congress would be the perfect institutional to serve as a repository of such a database.  Having one database to search, instead of innumerable private ones, would place much less burden on both creators and users of materials.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 12:59:06 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>