<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Kerr Defends the Third-Party Doctrine</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:46:40 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kerr Defends the Third-Party Doctrine</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/#comment-1454594</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Kerr spends a good deal of time explaining how third parties like phone companies, ISPs, online banks, and such allow people to hide illegal behavior that would otherwise take place in public.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's a slippery slope if there ever was one--the same could be said for draperies.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 02:46:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Kerr Defends the Third-Party Doctrine</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/05/30/kerr-defends-the-third-party-doctrine/#comment-1454595</link><description>Professor Kerr should have no objection to the federal government monitoring every single last action he takes that doesn't happen entirely in his own home. The moment he communicates or interacts with the outside world, the monitoring starts. Everything from grocery records, to bank statements, to emails, all monitored.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's the third party rule writ large. He shouldn't have any reason to complain.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeT</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:32:05 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>