<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Joe Consumer, Beta Tester</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/joe_consumer_beta_tester/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:32:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Joe Consumer, Beta Tester</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/01/23/joe-consumer-beta-tester/#comment-1449482</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great News, another defective copy protection scheme, which wil just increase the attractiveness of open source free software, which doessn't implement any of those silly, freedom-removing technologies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, keep on doing DRM, Microsoft, keep it up, and you will drive all your customers to Linux.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(Writing this on SuSE 10.0, fully configured to play  mp3's and play DVD's using DeCSS libraries.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:32:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Joe Consumer, Beta Tester</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/01/23/joe-consumer-beta-tester/#comment-1449481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"DRM = Defective By Design" is not merely a slogan. It's literally true. The design is defective. Examples multiply as time goes on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:46:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>