-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Since that $750 per family is money we don't have, that would be $750 per family plus interest on the debt in perpetuity. Or it could be monetized, in which case it regressively taxes everyone...
- For the record, the supporters of "Google violates its 'Don't be Evil' motto swept the floor with the Google apologists, even with Googleboy Larry Lessig in the audience. See the...
- Slippery slopes are everywhere, so I wouldn't worry about them. These issues about probable cause only apply to the government, as I understand them, but IANAL. Assuming there were something to...
- Apparently I can reply to your comment via e-mail. We'll see if this works. (later) Indeed it does, with a few formatting weirdnesses is all.
- Same here. My response to you hasn't shown up.I guess Disqus doesn't want to get anyone upset.
DISQUS
Returning? Login
1 year ago
As for why he's pushing the issue now, it seems likely that he's trying to set the agenda for the coming debate with the music industry. Apple's DRM problems in Europe are probably forcing him in that direction sooner than he otherwise would, but it would have happened in time anyway. The advantage to going ahead and publicly discussing it this way is that it puts more pressure onto the labels to consider the non-DRM option. The natural evolution of what's going on in Europe would be for DRM to be decreed to be interoperable. I think he's going public in an effort to bypass that option and go straight to unprotected sales.
1 year ago
The site www.allofmp3.com has provided a very important service to the content industry, showing that if prices are lowered, purchases will increase, in a highly elastic manner. So allofmp3.com has done important market research. But this is something that Jobs knew intuitively.
Recall that movie houses did very well during the 1930's.
Using those two pieces of information, the content industry may be able to weather the coming downturn.
1 year ago
1 year ago