<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:47:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453448</link><description>&lt;i&gt;I will happily admit to being in favor of lower taxes.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am in favor of reasonable taxes, and better spending, but I doubt that US tax burden is too high.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But in any case, my preference is to mediate taxes straightforwardly, through democratic and transparent processes.  So, with that preface, which democratic body should be able to levy taxes on the internet?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:47:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453449</link><description>I will happily admit to being in favor of lower taxes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453451</link><description>Yes, Tim I am perfectly aware of the mail order exception, which existed prior to the internet.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, your line of thinking would put all local business a structural disadvantage to those that are out of the area, and would eventually lead to a decline in tax revenues as internet sales increased.  To me that is a bug, but to those who want to do away with civic structures, it is a feature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just be honest--you would like to make it difficult for governments to tax, as a way of subverting democracy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:12:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453450</link><description>EF, if Washington state wanted to tax Amazon's sales to out-of-state individuals, it could.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And this "loophole" wasn't created for the Internet. Mail order companies have never been subject to the sales taxes of the jurisdictions they shipped to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:54:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453453</link><description>&lt;i&gt;Well, because these businesses use state services. Customers get to brick-and-mortar businesses on state and local roads.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Tim, then you should believe that if I buy something from Amazon, I should have to pay sales taxes in Washington state, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The internet should not be a giant loop hole for corporations or individuals to escape paying taxes, it just transfers power from civic agencies (your local police station, library, or Art Museum) to private capital aggregations, i.e., corporations.  We all lose when society is made poorer.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453452</link><description>(Tim, the "post" button on your preview page seems to be messed up -- it didn't post my comment.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Marti</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:48:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453454</link><description>Don't forget "use tax" -- in California and New York (don't know about other states) you're supposed to pay sales taxes on items you mail-order from out of state: &lt;a href="http://www.boe.ca.gov/sutax/usetaxreturn.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;"You generally owe California use tax when you use, consume, give away or store tangible personal property (i.e., products you can see, weigh, feel or touch, such as clothing, books, computers, DVDs or CDs) in California that you purchased from an out-of-state vendor."&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Marti</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 16:47:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453455</link><description>That's true, I suppose. I would bet that UPS consumes a lot fewer government services per dollar of merchandise delivered than your average brick-and-mortar store, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:10:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Sales Taxes and Fairness</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/25/internet-sales-taxes-and-fairness/#comment-1453456</link><description>As things stand now, we're basically subsidizing UPS.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pjdoland</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:39:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>