<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in How I Spent My Summer Vacation</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:38:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How I Spent My Summer Vacation</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/29/how-i-spent-my-summer-vacation/#comment-1987271</link><description>&lt;i&gt;But this theory doesn’t really explain actual individual instances of the behavior in the present or deviations from it; nor does it have any predictive power.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;No, I would take you to task there, Solveig.  For example, consider two populations of the same species in a changing encvironment, excepting only their behavior, which is one population is varied and the other it is very consistent.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The one that has a wide variety of behavior to chose from, as the environment changes, will adapt more quickly to that changing environemnt.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;He also notes that the theory leaves much unexplained–homosexuality being his choice of example (though how he knows that there is no evolutionary explanation for homosexuality a priori, I cannot imagine; there may very well be one, especially as it is common to many species).&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There have been several posited; the most convincing I've read also provided an explanation for the prevalence of bi-sexuality in females and it's comparative rarity in males; if he's done such a half-hearted attempt at research to exclude even these, I'll happily avoid this book.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:38:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>