<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Hazlett on the Microsoft Case at 10</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:43:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hazlett on the Microsoft Case at 10</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/28/hazlett-on-the-microsoft-case-at-10/#comment-1453252</link><description>Interestingly, if you do google that trademarked verb, the normal &lt;a href="http://answers.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;answers.com&lt;/a&gt; link to the dictionary definition does not come up.  If you google kleenex or xerox, you get an American Heritage definition that acknowledges the trademark and defines the colloquial use.  The same dictionary contains an identical entry for the verb "google", but apparently they forgot to index that page.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Timon</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:43:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>