...barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.
In other words, Commissioner Adelstein is suggesting that such a constitutional amendment would be the only legal way for the FCC to do what it's already doing. Wonderful logic.
eee_eff
· 3 years ago
We may forever lose the ability to prevent the airing of indecent material, barring an unlikely constitutional amendment setting limits on the First Amendment."
Of course, some of us are hoping (and predicting) that that's exactly what will happen!
Adam, so you're finally out of the closet, hoping that there will be a Constitutional Amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.
I had sensed that some of the posters at TLF and almost all of those at IPCentral felt this way, but they would never come out and say it. They would never address the issues that I would raise regarding First Amendment problems with the positions they take, and now I understand why...They are hoping the First Amendment will go away....
MikeT
· 3 years ago
Ummm, enigma_foundry, they're hoping for the power to regulate to go away.
All Comments
In other words, Commissioner Adelstein is suggesting that such a constitutional amendment would be the only legal way for the FCC to do what it's already doing. Wonderful logic.
Of course, some of us are hoping (and predicting) that that's exactly what will happen!
Adam, so you're finally out of the closet, hoping that there will be a Constitutional Amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.
I had sensed that some of the posters at TLF and almost all of those at IPCentral felt this way, but they would never come out and say it. They would never address the issues that I would raise regarding First Amendment problems with the positions they take, and now I understand why...They are hoping the First Amendment will go away....