Hello! The Technology Liberation Front is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- techliberation.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Steve R. -- you might want to read the Web Site User Agreement for my web site http://zgp.org/~dmarti/meta/tos/ and do something similar. (I was thinking of something like "by reading my blog...
- Incredibly hollow post, contracts of adhesion are designed to unilaterally "protect" the seller by "restricting" (depriving) the consumer of their rights. To assert that we...
- Why don't more proprietary software vendors use a common license? The proprietary EULAs mostly say the same things -- couldn't the BSA or somebody issue a standard one?
- Twitter as we know it was built for about $15-20 million. Google lasted almost a year on $100,000 before taking over the world with $25 million of investor money. This is highway robbery, you could...
- I think the news people are in a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" bind over Google's indexing and summarizing of their work. Allowing it to be indexed gets them a little...
2 years ago
In other words, Commissioner Adelstein is suggesting that such a constitutional amendment would be the only legal way for the FCC to do what it's already doing. Wonderful logic.
2 years ago
Of course, some of us are hoping (and predicting) that that's exactly what will happen!
Adam, so you're finally out of the closet, hoping that there will be a Constitutional Amendment setting limits on the First Amendment.
I had sensed that some of the posters at TLF and almost all of those at IPCentral felt this way, but they would never come out and say it. They would never address the issues that I would raise regarding First Amendment problems with the positions they take, and now I understand why...They are hoping the First Amendment will go away....
2 years ago