Hello! The Technology Liberation Front is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.
Community Page
- techliberation.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Your issue as I understand it is with Level 3 - are they an ILEC? Isn't Qwest (or a local coop) the ILEC there in Laramie? Two - you provide services a lot like a local exchange - I would guess...
- Yes, I will agree that you are not "getting me." First of all, I do not buy unbundled network elements (UNEs), nor am I a CLEC. I am a wireless ISP -- a true last mile provider and an...
- <i>I'd buy a newspaper that reported substance over he said/she said stenography mixed with tabloid fluff.</i> You might, but I think most of the evidence suggests that not very...
- This is too funny!
- Good point I Can't agree more ..... and its not if those people dnt want things to change ....
2 years ago
posted about this. I like this blog, and someone needs to point out
stuff like this.
You claim the deadline hasn't passed, yet every source I've read says
the deadline was December 15, 2005. I reference the following links:
http://news.zdnet.com/...........
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/............
http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/..........
If you have evidence to the contrary, please post it. I searched your
article for "deadline", and couldn't find anywhere an actual date in
the future.
So I don't understand why you say the deadline hasn't passed.
In any event, we all know MS is tasked with doing the near impossible.
However, it should be possible for any decent software company whose
source base is more organized than a spaghetti bowl. And that's really
the whole point. They brought this on themselves.
I mean no disrespect and don't want to start a flame, but I have
serious questions with your claim about the deadline date. Please
respond if you have some reference that says something different.