<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Eric Schmidt was Tooling Down the Road Looking for a Burger When . . .</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:30:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt was Tooling Down the Road Looking for a Burger When . . .</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/23/eric-schmidt-was-tooling-down-the-road-looking-for-a-burger-when/#comment-1451874</link><description>Google's failure would be the market working its will - people protect their privacy (without regulatory protection) by shunning goods and services that don't meet their privacy demands.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This post is mostly an observation based on my understanding of privacy, not a restatement of libertarian dogma.  It's bad for everybody (a little bit) if a business model fails (wasted assets, foregone cool toys), so I'm helping Google figure out their problems.  You're welcome, Google.  ;-P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jimharper</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:30:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Eric Schmidt was Tooling Down the Road Looking for a Burger When . . .</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/08/23/eric-schmidt-was-tooling-down-the-road-looking-for-a-burger-when/#comment-1451873</link><description>But I thought the market would take care of that? (I'm being slightly snarky, but I'm also being slightly serious in asking that. I'm not sure why this would bother the serious libertarian, I guess.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>