<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Eric Holder and Tech Policy</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/eric_holder_and_tech_policy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:29:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Eric Holder and Tech Policy</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/02/eric-holder-and-tech-policy/#comment-4138812</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The most interesting part about Declan's piece was when he discussed ACLU and EPIC's response to the nomination of Eric Holder. While CEI and Cato expressed serious concerns about Holder's past statements on encryption and data retention issues, groups whose primary focus is civil liberties were unusually restrained in their remarks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EPIC and ACLU are supposed to be vigilant watchdogs of privacy, yet they seem eager to give Mr Holder the benefit of the doubt in spite of his troubling track record. That Democrats have generally been less objectionable than Republicans on the issues of privacy and free speech hardly excuses the whitewashing rhetoric expressed by Mark Rotenberg.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Radia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:29:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>