<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Does &amp;#8220;the public&amp;#8221; really communicate with the FCC?</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:20:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Does &amp;#8220;the public&amp;#8221; really communicate with the FCC?</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/13/does-the-public-really-communicate-with-the-fcc/#comment-1452869</link><description>You have to wonder whether the PTC website generates three messages to the FCC for each individual American who uses it to express their opinion, don't you ?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Brand</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:20:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does &amp;#8220;the public&amp;#8221; really communicate with the FCC?</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/13/does-the-public-really-communicate-with-the-fcc/#comment-1452870</link><description>With all due respect, complaints filed with the FCC via the Parents Television Council website are not "computer generated" any more so than any message sent to Capitol Hill or elsewhere via any similiar online communications service (ie Capwiz or Voter Voice).  Indeed such communications are generated by individual Americans - aka the owners of the broadcast airwaves - who have a right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.  Surely you're not suggesting that the voices of hundreds of thousands of Americans should be silenced simply because you don't like what they say or the method by which they communicate with their government?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Isett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:03:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does &amp;#8220;the public&amp;#8221; really communicate with the FCC?</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/13/does-the-public-really-communicate-with-the-fcc/#comment-1452868</link><description>With all due respect, complaints filed with the FCC via the Parents Television Council website are not "computer generated" any more so than any message sent to Capitol Hill or elsewhere via any similiar online communications service (ie Capwiz or Voter Voice).  Indeed such communications are generated by individual Americans - aka the owners of the broadcast airwaves - who have a right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.  Surely you're not suggesting that the voices of hundreds of thousands of Americans should be silenced simply because you don't like what they say or the method by which they communicate with their government?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Isett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does &amp;#8220;the public&amp;#8221; really communicate with the FCC?</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/12/13/does-the-public-really-communicate-with-the-fcc/#comment-1452871</link><description>With all due respect, complaints filed with the FCC via the Parents Television Council website are not "computer generated" any more so than any message sent to Capitol Hill or elsewhere via any similiar online communications service (ie Capwiz or Voter Voice).  Indeed such communications are generated by individual Americans - aka the owners of the broadcast airwaves - who have a right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.  Surely you're not suggesting that the voices of hundreds of thousands of Americans should be silenced simply because you don't like what they say or the method by which they communicate with their government?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Isett</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>