<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Dan Rather and the Ego Hall of Fame</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:57:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Dan Rather and the Ego Hall of Fame</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/10/dan-rather-and-the-ego-hall-of-fame/#comment-1453141</link><description>Thank Gawd for clear-headed posters like Enema-Foundry.  That GWB is the REAL terrorist and criminel!  But O'Billary will bring justice to the entire crony Administration. Iron Coffins with spikes on the inside would be too good.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fong the Invincible</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan Rather and the Ego Hall of Fame</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/10/dan-rather-and-the-ego-hall-of-fame/#comment-1453140</link><description>Showing the documents in the first piece was a mistake, but an understandable one.  The problem was the failure (by Rather and producer Mary Mapes) to get a qualified person to address the bloggers' point that "hey, this looks like Microsoft Word" in subsequent pieces.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Marti</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:21:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan Rather and the Ego Hall of Fame</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/10/dan-rather-and-the-ego-hall-of-fame/#comment-1453139</link><description>Yes, to have a commentator who actually criticized W, boy that's off balance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, CBS's own experts vouchsafed the authenticity of those documents, so Dan was reporting what the expert said--as he should have.  By doing so, the conflict between two opposing point eventually resulted in the truth coming out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, only the "truth" that compliment W is allowed to come out. Anything that would describe him as a war criminal and a terrorist, which are the most fair-minded and reasonable descriptions I can think of for W, is not given much play.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See Noam Chomsky's excellent book Interventions for dozens of Op-Eds criticizing W, not one of which was ever carried by a mainstream American newspaper.  Freedom of the Press, Yeah Team!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:19:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan Rather and the Ego Hall of Fame</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/10/dan-rather-and-the-ego-hall-of-fame/#comment-1453138</link><description>Good point.  Thanks for participating in my wikiproofreading system...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Gattuso</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:52:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dan Rather and the Ego Hall of Fame</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/01/10/dan-rather-and-the-ego-hall-of-fame/#comment-1453137</link><description>I think CBS should just pay up the seventy dollars; it'd be cheaper than defending the suit.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cabalamat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:49:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>