Community Page
- techliberation.com/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Your issue as I understand it is with Level 3 - are they an ILEC? Isn't Qwest (or a local coop) the ILEC there in Laramie? Two - you provide services a lot like a local exchange - I would guess...
- Yes, I will agree that you are not "getting me." First of all, I do not buy unbundled network elements (UNEs), nor am I a CLEC. I am a wireless ISP -- a true last mile provider and an...
- <i>I'd buy a newspaper that reported substance over he said/she said stenography mixed with tabloid fluff.</i> You might, but I think most of the evidence suggests that not very...
- This is too funny!
- Good point I Can't agree more ..... and its not if those people dnt want things to change ....
The Technology Liberation Front
The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.
Back in the mid- and even late 1990s, I was engaged in a lot of dreadfully boring telecom policy debates in which the proponents of regulation flatly refused to accept the argument that the hegemony of wireline communications systems would ever be seriously challenged by wireless networks. Well,
... Continue reading »
6 months ago
Yet, there is a market in which closed devices are the norm: cell phones. The US cell-phone market is dominated by phones that are only capable of doing what the phone company allows the phone to do. Yes, it is possible to purchase an unlocked phone, but that incurs an often significant cost.
I think there are two equilibria here - one in which device makers and network operators collaborate (i.e. the cell phone model), and one in which device makers and network operators remain independent (the internet model). I'm not convinced that the market from internet access is incapable of switching to the cell-phone market equilibrium.