<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Copyright Term v. Copyright Inception</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:54:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Copyright Term v. Copyright Inception</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/11/24/copyright-term-v-copyright-inception/#comment-1452704</link><description>The economist also had an article a while back with a graph along the bottom of the page, showing the growth of the length of copyright terms, going back to Queen Anne's laws, the graph's line running up through the text of the article, as it increased...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Think it was about 4 or 5 years ago...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Copyright Term v. Copyright Inception</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/11/24/copyright-term-v-copyright-inception/#comment-1452702</link><description>Thanks for the graph.  It really makes it clear where copyright extensions were introduced and how far they've been extended relative to the initial term.&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;What color are you going to choose for the inevitable next extension?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DH</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>