<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Broadband For The People</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:53:11 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Broadband For The People</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/#comment-1453467</link><description>&lt;i&gt;The interesting and relevant question is whether and to what degree it’s possible to proscribe network management practices which most reasonable people would consider inappropriate without unintentionally preventing network providers from trying to improve their services while earning a competitive return on their investment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My Doublespeak detector meant off on that one, Hance. How about: "Network Neutrality is hard to define." &lt;/i&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Broadband For The People</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/26/broadband-for-the-people/#comment-1453466</link><description>I'd still like to see more options for home broadband than the two incumbents, but it's clear that additional competitors will have to deploy wireless networks. The open internet rules the net neutrality freaks are proposing are very harmful to wireless networks, of course, and that's why all right-thinking Americans have to oppose them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BubbaDude</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:24:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>