<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in And the &amp;#8220;Luddite of the Year&amp;#8221; Award Goes to&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:48:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: And the &amp;#8220;Luddite of the Year&amp;#8221; Award Goes to&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/26/and-the-luddite-of-the-year-award-goes-to/#comment-1861234</link><description>If only we had some kind of Constitutional provision that could prohibit such blatant attempts to stifle speech...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bszoka</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:48:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And the &amp;#8220;Luddite of the Year&amp;#8221; Award Goes to&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/26/and-the-luddite-of-the-year-award-goes-to/#comment-1857874</link><description>Yeah, that article was ridiculous.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">binarybits</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:15:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: And the &amp;#8220;Luddite of the Year&amp;#8221; Award Goes to&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/08/26/and-the-luddite-of-the-year-award-goes-to/#comment-1856898</link><description>That article was the most blatant demand for government assistance for newspapers I've seen in a very long time. He explicitly states that the policy would work to the benefit of his business, and not others. Yet, for some reason, I can also see this guy breathlessly denouncing "corporate welfare" when it comes in the form of &lt;em&gt;tax breaks&lt;/em&gt; to companies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This shows just how idiotic the man is:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;It could be done via a progressive energy tax designed to keep energy prices at a consistently high level (while providing assistance to lower- and middle-income Americans).&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And what will they do? They'll turn right back around and use the very same devil PCs that Horwitt wants to get rid of with that "assistance."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MikeRT</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:59:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>