-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- I see that Coinstar now also offers vouchers for Starbucks or iTunes. How do you redeem the voucher with Starbucks? Do they give you a Starbucks card? Regardless, I've got a lot of coffee...
- Dude, I'm just joking with you Applebees. Chill. And yes, the stylus is soooo 1994. But some things from the past are worth preserving.
- Steve: Great comment, to which I would add just a couple of points. First, to the extent that a corporation that may provide the "pipes" is separate from one that provides the content,...
- My top 5: 1. <a href="http://ww.autohotkey.com/">AutoHotKey</a> - This is a simple yet powerful macro scripting program for Windows. I created a simple one-line script...
- "Don’t understand how you iPhone zombies get along without one." It does not help your argument any when you insist on insulting users of another device. You arguments come off as...
The Technology Liberation Front
The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.
What a delightful chapter title in Adam Shostack’s and Andrew Stewart’s new book, The New School of Information Security. Adam is a guy I’ve known for a lot of years now â somehow. He always seems to pop up in the places I go â both physically %2
... Continue reading »
6 months ago
That's hardly a happenstance-the law is doing what it was intended to do. The correct term for that is: Good Design.
6 months ago
6 months ago
To the point being discussed in the comments, my understanding of 1386 (and this is explicit in the preamble of the law) is that it was intended to allow people at risk of identity theft to protect themselves. The transparency it delivers is an unexpected consequence. As I'm sure readers of this blog are aware, designing such a mechanism is quite tricky, and anticipating all of the consequences is even harder.