<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Airport Security Technology Stuck in the Pipeline</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><atom:link href="https://tlf.disqus.com/airport_security_technology_stuck_in_the_pipeline/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:05:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Airport Security Technology Stuck in the Pipeline</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/02/08/airport-security-technology-stuck-in-the-pipeline/#comment-1453327</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;We would see faster development of better, more consumer-friendly security technology if the airlines were entirely responsible for it.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, because the airlines would never internalize the risks that the place society in by their activities unless: we impose strict liability for any breach of security on the airline.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In other words, we would make American Airlines and United &lt;b&gt;entirely&lt;/b&gt; responsible for &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; of the damage done by their airplanes hitting the World Trade Center on 9/11.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As part of such strict liability, we would require airlines to be bonded and insured against such catastrophic losses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is that part of your proposal?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eee_eff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:05:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>