<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in Against Platform Monopolies: Conclusion</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:34:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Against Platform Monopolies: Conclusion</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/07/27/against-platform-monopolies-conclusion/#comment-1446646</link><description>5514222223d8 Great work    &lt;a href="http:/0zu.tw/" rel="nofollow"&gt;short url&lt;/a&gt; short url</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">short url</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:34:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Against Platform Monopolies: Conclusion</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/07/27/against-platform-monopolies-conclusion/#comment-1446645</link><description>Tim, I've looked through your posts on "monopoly platforms" and while interesting, I'm curious what exactly do you mean by "monopoly." Do you mean protected by IP, with semi or fully closed protocols, centralized control by a vertically integrated platform creator? Can you give some examples...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also, some good related article:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=216533"&gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=913402"&gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:55:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Against Platform Monopolies: Conclusion</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/07/27/against-platform-monopolies-conclusion/#comment-1446644</link><description>To those of us who drank the Internet Kool-Aid long ago, the superiority of open standards is so self-evident that lengthy justifications don't seem necessary. Obviuously, however, not everyone sees things this way (University of Chicago law-and-economics types seem to have special difficulty "getting it"), so work like this is very important.  Thanks, Mr. Lee!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug Lay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:08:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Against Platform Monopolies: Conclusion</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/07/27/against-platform-monopolies-conclusion/#comment-1446643</link><description>Thanks Peter! I'm glad someone was interested to read it all the way through. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:13:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Against Platform Monopolies: Conclusion</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2006/07/27/against-platform-monopolies-conclusion/#comment-1446642</link><description>You've done a truly wonderful job putting together this argument... I've gotten so tired of neo-Schumpeterians claiming that because companies *like* monopoly profits, and often hope to have them temporarily, we must therefore move heaven and earth to guarantee them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PLN</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:39:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>