http://tlf.disqus.com/The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.enMon, 22 Jan 2007 02:36:53 -0000http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-144493081e31de21f46 Great work <a href="http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav">http://www.abc-acupuncture.com/baxqorav</a> tramadoltramadolMon, 22 Jan 2007 02:36:53 -0000http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-1444929da6c15eee5a4 Very good http:/0zu.tw/ short urlshort urlWed, 20 Dec 2006 10:31:13 -0000http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-1444928Stan, I've spoken to people at Google about their practices and, as I say in the piece, they haven't been very forthcoming. <p>Seems you went ahead and "dialogued" about our piece without doing any original research, a practice deleterious to intelligent conversation, IYHO. </p><p>If you disagree with some of our facts or assumptions, perhaps you'd like to say what your disagreements are. I dare say "lazy" applies to someone who takes potshots (that miss) but doesn't add any information or opinion.</p>jimharperWed, 25 Jan 2006 15:35:02 -0000http://techliberation.com/2006/01/23/a-friendly-conversation-about-corporate-high-tech-engagement-with-china/#comment-1444927Just wondering if you contacted any of these companies for comment prior to dialoging about their business. By reading this, it seems the answer is "no." IMHO, in order to have an intelligent conversation about this issue some original research might first take place. Relying on France-based "reporters without borders" placed editorials for your information on this topic is, at best, lazy and, at worse, a disservice to your organizations and those who support your "work."Stan BingTue, 24 Jan 2006 03:08:49 -0000