http://tlf.disqus.com/The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.enFri, 14 Dec 2007 16:27:23 -0000http://techliberation.com/2007/12/10/a-free-speech-playbook-for-american-companies-doing-business-overseas/#comment-1452844I disagree that China's citizens would still have the same amount of access to American content or anything that resembles pro-democracy / human rights content. For instance, Google does a good job of self-censoring to remove what it thinks will be offending content from a page, so that at least some content from a particular website gets through. Otherwise, China's censors would just block the entire page. Google doesn't know exactly what will or won't offend censors - it's not like there's an official list. It likely pushes the boundary to see what it can or can't get away with. A Chinese ISP would not have access to the unblocked pages because it would already be behind the government's firewall, and therefore less content would be available to the Chinese people.bradencoxFri, 14 Dec 2007 16:27:23 -0000http://techliberation.com/2007/12/10/a-free-speech-playbook-for-american-companies-doing-business-overseas/#comment-1452845China will still have "American content" whether or not American businesses are operating in China. The alternative you suggest is a false one.<br><br>While American companies have a business presence in China, and employees who are in the country, they're subject to extortion of information about dissidents. Lobbying for changes isn't going to help the immediate situation. If a company faces the choice between helping to violate the rights of dissidents and pulling out of a country, its moral obligation is to pull out.Gary McGathWed, 12 Dec 2007 11:27:12 -0000