<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in A Copyright Issue Everyone Can Agree On</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:00:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Copyright Issue Everyone Can Agree On</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/27/a-copyright-issue-everyone-can-agree-on/#comment-1450730</link><description>And I forgot to mention that you'll never get actual precedent out of a fair use violation like this one; it'll never get to court because the case will settle or be dropped. So, again, what Lessig is doing is very smart (even if it doesn't work in this cycle.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis Villa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:00:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Copyright Issue Everyone Can Agree On</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/27/a-copyright-issue-everyone-can-agree-on/#comment-1450729</link><description>Jeff Jarvis is on a tear with this issue over at &lt;a href="http://buzzmachine.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;buzzmachine.com&lt;/a&gt;.  Unfortunately, it seems that NBC hasn't bought into the idea that the debate footage should be open to all.  However, in typical Internet fashion, NBC's copyright terms are simply being ignored by everyone from Jarvis himself to Presidential candidate Joe Biden.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug Lay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:53:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Copyright Issue Everyone Can Agree On</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/27/a-copyright-issue-everyone-can-agree-on/#comment-1450728</link><description>There are a fairly large number of those, Don; this is instead a massively high profile way to get CC licenses (presumably) slapped on something.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a bonus, it is guaranteed that the content would get remixed and reused, not just copied and distributed. Really smart move by Lessig.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis Villa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Copyright Issue Everyone Can Agree On</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2007/04/27/a-copyright-issue-everyone-can-agree-on/#comment-1450727</link><description>It's hard to imagine a use of debate footage that wouldn't qualify as fair use.  Why throw away the opportunity to get a slam-dunk fair-use-affirming precedent into the law books?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Marti</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:30:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>