<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Technology Liberation Front - Latest Comments in &amp;#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&amp;#8221; (S. 602) signed by President Bush</title><link>http://tlf.disqus.com/</link><description>The Technology Liberation Front is the tech policy blog dedicated to keeping politicians' hands off the 'net and everything else related to technology.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:38:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&amp;#8221; (S. 602) signed by President Bush</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/02/child-safe-viewing-act-s-602-signed-by-president-bush/#comment-21004507</link><description>I wish you like ugg boots,ugg boots 2009</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">uggworld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:38:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&amp;#8221; (S. 602) signed by President Bush</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/02/child-safe-viewing-act-s-602-signed-by-president-bush/#comment-21004449</link><description>do you like ugg boots?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">uggworld</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:37:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&amp;#8221; (S. 602) signed by President Bush</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/02/child-safe-viewing-act-s-602-signed-by-president-bush/#comment-4254523</link><description>Sounds like censorship wrapped up in a cloak of fear mongering - business as usual on Capitol Hill.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">acedebase</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:28:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&amp;#8221; (S. 602) signed by President Bush</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/02/child-safe-viewing-act-s-602-signed-by-president-bush/#comment-4152214</link><description>Explain to me how using the copyright code to limit the term of "violent" or "indecent" material to 2 years isn't just another form of government censorship. It would be a blatant First Amendment violation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam_Thierer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:59:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;Child Safe Viewing Act&amp;#8221; (S. 602) signed by President Bush</title><link>http://techliberation.com/2008/12/02/child-safe-viewing-act-s-602-signed-by-president-bush/#comment-4145214</link><description>Congress isn't using all the clubs in its bag when it comes to child-safe content.  Just cut the copyright term for violent and/or indencent material to two years.  Plenty of time for a hot game, or a movie's theatrical and DVD release, but short enough that it would tend to drive investment to more productive material.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don Marti</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:29:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>