-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Dude, I'm just joking with you Applebees. Chill. And yes, the stylus is soooo 1994. But some things from the past are worth preserving.
- Steve: Great comment, to which I would add just a couple of points. First, to the extent that a corporation that may provide the "pipes" is separate from one that provides the content,...
- My top 5: 1. <a href="http://ww.autohotkey.com/">AutoHotKey</a> - This is a simple yet powerful macro scripting program for Windows. I created a simple one-line script...
- "Don’t understand how you iPhone zombies get along without one." It does not help your argument any when you insist on insulting users of another device. You arguments come off as...
- I haven't seen the actual lawsuit so I'll take your word for it. The letters speak vaguely of "proprietary material" which I assumed includes the photographs. It's possible...
DISQUS
Returning? Login
9 months ago
This seems a little counter-intuitive to me, so I'd like to know what business psychology it addresses. Does he think that business people invest most in the areas with the least chance of a reasonable rate of return? Really? Or does he just want to take carriers out of the picture and have the government wire the neighborhood.
9 months ago
A point I fear will be missed is that we have many broadband strategies, each being run by separate companies, and not on the taxpayer's dime. The question should be whether the gov't can possibly do better with one "national" plan instead of multiple competitive ones.
(I was on TLF's TPW #35 on this topic.)
9 months ago
Besides, isn't the Bush administration market-oriented enough?
Drew Clark
9 months ago
9 months ago
Not sure the Bush admin is market enough, frankly. They're still gov't after all -- no one actually wants to shrink the organization that pays their check. Eg, Kevin Martin.
How about one the fine folks here at TLF? Tim Lee? Adam? Very credible folks.
9 months ago